richardthinks (richardthinks) wrote,

critical theory explained/unmasked!

Over at irregular webcomic an unnamed commenter has neatly unraveled the strange power dynamic of academic critical theory. I think this is the shortest, most concise and clearest explanation of the whole damn thing I've ever come across.

For context, go see the strip:
...the strip in question is 1278

Short form: a nurse, blocking Jane Goodall's path, quibbles about ape/monkey distinctions. Goodall sweeps her aside, saying: "Same difference! Out of my way!"

comment reproduced here:

Having previously tried to ascertain that semantic difference between "monkey" and "ape", I'm no longer sure there is a useful such distinction. I used to think "monkeys have tails, apes do not", but apparently that isn't true. Although no apes have tails, there are also some monkeys that don't. In fact, as Wikipedia says:

Because they are not a single coherent group, monkeys do not have any particular traits that they all share and are not shared with the remaining group of simians, the apes.

It turns out that the so-called "monkeys" are a paraphyletic combination of the Cercopithecoidea and Platyrrhini.

So, I saw Jane Goodall's comment as insightful because she ignored a broad colloquial terminology which is of dubious value to a scientist and saw this strip as more of a post-modern social satire with ironically self-referential humour playing off a stereotypical view of scientists and their relationship to the human-ape societies they function within. The superior air with which the Goodall character sweeps aside the hospital orderly, who, despite being a pretender to the sci-tech elite Goodall represents, has no firm grasp of the subtleties of non-human simian relations (as Goodall does), shows that even within an elite there are elites, mirroring that very human/ape/monkey need to construct hierarchies, if only to serve as social markers of, and barriers to, power. Goodall's dominance is at once asserted by her ability not only to master the terminology but to reinterpret it to a subordinate and dilettante, showing her mastery not only of the field but also of her ignorant rival in not only this area but in all other areas, vis-a-vis the orderly's attempted function as a security barrier; yet that very assertion of dominance is mocked by the construction and form within which this social commentary arrives, a comic. Like all good art, which holds up a mirror to ourselves and, by reflection, illuminates the human condition, this satire uses a researcher of simians to examine the societal workings of that most often omitted species within that group, the humans, and to thereby subversively reassert our clear membership of it. So, on the contrary, it's both humorous and deep, which makes it very, very clever.

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.